20
edits
Federation with Threads: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
(A page to describe the history of decisions around SocialCoop federating with Threads) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Even before [https://threads.net Threads] launched rumors were circulating that Meta's new social media platform would support the ActivityPub protocol, which would allow it to interoperate with Mastodon instances like SocialCoop's. These rumors prompted quite a bit of discussion in the SocialCoop community, which was initially focused on whether or not SocialCoop should sign on to the [https://fedipact.online/ Anti-Meta Fedi Pact] These discussions largely took place in [[Loomio]], which are linked to in the timeline below. | Even before [https://threads.net Threads] launched rumors were circulating that Meta's new social media platform would support the ActivityPub protocol, which would allow it to interoperate with Mastodon instances like SocialCoop's. These rumors prompted quite a bit of discussion in the SocialCoop community, which was initially focused on whether or not SocialCoop should sign on to the [https://fedipact.online/ Anti-Meta Fedi Pact] These discussions largely took place in [[Loomio]], which are linked to in the timeline below. | ||
As a result of the poll on July 10, 2023 SocialCoop's Mastodon instance is currently set to | As a result of the poll on July 10, 2023 SocialCoop's Mastodon instance is currently set to ''Limit'' Threads, not to ''Suspend''. This effectively means that posts from Threads accounts are invisible to anyone who hasn't chosen to following them. But users are not blocked from following Threads users. You can learn more about the differences between Limit and Suspend in the [https://docs.joinmastodon.org/admin/moderation/#server-wide-moderation Mastodon documentation]. | ||
=== Timeline === | === Timeline === | ||